"Whether or not to extend the alarm, the government will guarantee the air service at Christmas and every day the year. "-José Blanco, Minister of Development-
Before renewing the state of alarm propose the government to change its name: it will now be called" state of tranquility. " This takes away the concern to which we have seen no clear recourse to emergency measures to resolve a labor issue. And overall, as they insist that they have found precisely to reassure citizens, not alarmed, the name change will come into the hair.
I know that many have been held so far, and actually feel more relaxed when scheduling your trip knowing that firm have the drivers. But I wonder how it is perceived, whether as alarm or tranquility, others these days are aware of what's happening in our skies: the potential investors to pointing the imminent privatization of airports.
If you were strong and investors were thinking of entering the capital gain AENA or the granting of Barajas and El Prat, how would it happen? Do they alarmed the state of alarm? Or on the contrary what they were alarmed by the high salaries of drivers and their unruly behavior? And not only drivers, drivers and ground crew who believed to wage war against privatization in the coming weeks, and who now have left for better times.
In January this year in Congress, the minister said White to privatize the airport was "essential" to do before a reform of air navigation in the direction of more efficiency, more labor productivity and lower costs. Otherwise, investors would be interested in purchasing. And where to look, the current conflict can leave the airport as a basin, with the drivers tamed, lowered costs and working more hours, and the rest sector workers with beards to soak for what might happen.
Which brings me to one last question: if the navigation is so crucial to declare a state of alarm, can be left in private hands? It's a silly question, you need not to answer.
0 comments:
Post a Comment