Friday, November 26, 2010
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Images Of Waxing Hand
of dictatorship and right-thinking sensibilities
Public appeared in last Monday an article that referred, in a very opportunistic, a word of Cayo Lara (federal coordinator of UI), taking them verbatim without stopping to analyze the term that evoked them (which, incidentally, sadly widespread in our 'objectified' means). The headline read:
"" We want a dictatorship, "he proclaimed (...) Cayo Lara, to an audience that was stunned at his words (...). Then the nuance: "We want the laws lead to Gazette to the dictates of workers and not the corporate interests , fully democratic means." Those attending the meeting he held with young Lara the federation broke into applause then. "
For starters, there are several things Sticking. I at least assistant there, I stayed nothing "shocked" but excited. The bold, in the original, erroneous or maliciously highlights the arguments in the negative rather than positive that it might be assumed he emphasized the coordinator. The audience broke into applause is something interpreted, but had no other motivation than simply closing argument.
In my humble opinion, and I hope you have been, Cayo Lara tried, more or less evasive, retrieve a term of political leguaje pure referring to a project in the long term, something that today it seems that Horizon is being lost. The problem is that there remains a sensitivity product of a special ideological drift to the right thinking that condemns all that is out of the channels of the really existing or belonging in their parameters to the 'politically incorrect'. So homely a term today as the "dictatorship" of course, is automatically sentenced and returned to the trunk of the scornful. Sticking 'workers' would automatically lead the reader to the concept, which can be very radical political view, but that is the essence same of "Democracy."
This is arguably now forgotten as the drift, I repeat, right, our understanding of the 'demos' and 'res publica'. As was understood by Marx and Lenin, the "dictatorship of the proletariat" (referring to the offspring) was not only the replacement of the majority and the minority ruling class that rules. This replacement is becoming a bottom-up process intended to achieve a horizontal government, abolishing the exploitation of man by man (first and last concern of Marx).
This conception, which of course brings us to an extreme form of understanding politics is not new or even much less radical:
"Nace, therefore, democracy, I think, when it has expired the poor, kill some of their opponents, others were banished and others also make them participants in the government and the charges "(Plato, Republic The , 557 to ).
Aristotle even moves beyond the concept, make-up as it is understood today-an oxymoron, claiming that democracy is government of the poor, not the majority. This means that if the minority poor, democracy would be the government less. During the French Revolution, the terms used by the bourgeoisie did not pass the "Republic", and would be insulted Robespierre (Along with many others, including such luminaries as Babeuf) who put on the table, sustained governance model on "Democracy." Napoleon came to settle the revolution, but to cancel this latest project, which would not be mentioned again until the twentieth century.
Put together, then "Democracy" and "dictatorship of the proletariat" is really a tautology that is shocking (at least that is publicly revealed) to any Democrat who says today, the right and Esperanza Aguirre, or left and José Luis R. Zapatero. fellow IU Open (do not know who or whom, because it is not signed) have been less. Open IU is reluctant to "any kind of dictatorship" (the analogy made with the Franco seems to me an insult to the intelligence), thus avoiding what is the heritage of the Left's basic capital, the historical movement from below to achieve their emancipation. Such a sentence (in my opinion) is an emanation of a hegemony of thought that now belongs to the right.
understand, moreover, that a pure democratic project as mentioned by Gaius Lara (if, I repeat, not a merely dialectical action) may not be shared by many who make up the United Left coalition. The intensity of I guess that popular sovereignty is somewhat dependent on the idiosyncrasies of each, and then I understand the need to oppose "the dictatorship of the workers" to "market." Coalitions in establishing programs based on minimum. But in the same way as I can agree with this, which is far from what I think would be a democracy, would have to be accepted the project more 'radical' as plausible, no prior convictions, and let the realization of either the contingency and hegemony. Because the end point of achieving human emancipation is left. One who does not understand well, at least not obvious.
"" We want a dictatorship, "he proclaimed (...) Cayo Lara, to an audience that was stunned at his words (...). Then the nuance: "We want the laws lead to Gazette to the dictates of workers and not the corporate interests , fully democratic means." Those attending the meeting he held with young Lara the federation broke into applause then. "
For starters, there are several things Sticking. I at least assistant there, I stayed nothing "shocked" but excited. The bold, in the original, erroneous or maliciously highlights the arguments in the negative rather than positive that it might be assumed he emphasized the coordinator. The audience broke into applause is something interpreted, but had no other motivation than simply closing argument.
In my humble opinion, and I hope you have been, Cayo Lara tried, more or less evasive, retrieve a term of political leguaje pure referring to a project in the long term, something that today it seems that Horizon is being lost. The problem is that there remains a sensitivity product of a special ideological drift to the right thinking that condemns all that is out of the channels of the really existing or belonging in their parameters to the 'politically incorrect'. So homely a term today as the "dictatorship" of course, is automatically sentenced and returned to the trunk of the scornful. Sticking 'workers' would automatically lead the reader to the concept, which can be very radical political view, but that is the essence same of "Democracy."
This is arguably now forgotten as the drift, I repeat, right, our understanding of the 'demos' and 'res publica'. As was understood by Marx and Lenin, the "dictatorship of the proletariat" (referring to the offspring) was not only the replacement of the majority and the minority ruling class that rules. This replacement is becoming a bottom-up process intended to achieve a horizontal government, abolishing the exploitation of man by man (first and last concern of Marx).
This conception, which of course brings us to an extreme form of understanding politics is not new or even much less radical:
"Nace, therefore, democracy, I think, when it has expired the poor, kill some of their opponents, others were banished and others also make them participants in the government and the charges "(Plato, Republic The , 557 to ).
Aristotle even moves beyond the concept, make-up as it is understood today-an oxymoron, claiming that democracy is government of the poor, not the majority. This means that if the minority poor, democracy would be the government less. During the French Revolution, the terms used by the bourgeoisie did not pass the "Republic", and would be insulted Robespierre (Along with many others, including such luminaries as Babeuf) who put on the table, sustained governance model on "Democracy." Napoleon came to settle the revolution, but to cancel this latest project, which would not be mentioned again until the twentieth century.
Put together, then "Democracy" and "dictatorship of the proletariat" is really a tautology that is shocking (at least that is publicly revealed) to any Democrat who says today, the right and Esperanza Aguirre, or left and José Luis R. Zapatero. fellow IU Open (do not know who or whom, because it is not signed) have been less. Open IU is reluctant to "any kind of dictatorship" (the analogy made with the Franco seems to me an insult to the intelligence), thus avoiding what is the heritage of the Left's basic capital, the historical movement from below to achieve their emancipation. Such a sentence (in my opinion) is an emanation of a hegemony of thought that now belongs to the right.
understand, moreover, that a pure democratic project as mentioned by Gaius Lara (if, I repeat, not a merely dialectical action) may not be shared by many who make up the United Left coalition. The intensity of I guess that popular sovereignty is somewhat dependent on the idiosyncrasies of each, and then I understand the need to oppose "the dictatorship of the workers" to "market." Coalitions in establishing programs based on minimum. But in the same way as I can agree with this, which is far from what I think would be a democracy, would have to be accepted the project more 'radical' as plausible, no prior convictions, and let the realization of either the contingency and hegemony. Because the end point of achieving human emancipation is left. One who does not understand well, at least not obvious.
Monday, November 15, 2010
Where Are Glory Holes In Oc?
"Sahara deserve an explanation"
El lunes 8 por la mañana, las fuerzas de seguridad marroquíes entraron por la fuerza en un campamento de protesta saharaui en El Aaiún. Golpearon a los residentes y les atacaron con gases lacrimógenos y cañones de agua para obligarles a abandonar las tiendas, que quemaron o derribaron – según activistas locales.
El desenlace fue trágico: varias personas (de las fuerzas de seguridad y civiles) perdieron la vida y otras resultaron heridas. Miles de personas fueron obligadas a abandonar el campamento , que sigue asediado por las fuerzas security. We
independent and transparent investigation of what happened. And we want, if proved excessive use of force, those responsible brought to justice . So ask you to sign this petition the Government of Morocco.
Amnesty International - English Section
El desenlace fue trágico: varias personas (de las fuerzas de seguridad y civiles) perdieron la vida y otras resultaron heridas. Miles de personas fueron obligadas a abandonar el campamento , que sigue asediado por las fuerzas security. We
independent and transparent investigation of what happened. And we want, if proved excessive use of force, those responsible brought to justice . So ask you to sign this petition the Government of Morocco.
Amnesty International - English Section
Monday, November 8, 2010
Buoyancy Of The Helium-filled Latex
2010-2011 EDUCATIONAL GRANTS-PORTAL SUPERIOR. ANUIES
Portal that has spread to all higher education scholarships in Mexico and abroad .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)