In the last two days have spoken much about air traffic controllers and the consequences of his unlawful act had. I have found interesting revealingly all positions found within the blogosphere, and there have been many IU colleagues with whom I discussed the subject.
To begin with, those who have positioned themselves against the drivers, with varying nuances, have been claiming the privileges that this group enjoys. In my opinion this argument has an unnecessary space because they have absolutely nothing to do with what happened here. So I think a fallacious argument would not enter the debate, have the privileges they have. What affects the discussion? What adds element or condition?
Another strength has been the patent illegality of the protest forms. This is undeniable, in my humble opinion is nuanced. To me, this has been derived directly from the classic "action-reaction 'and this argument is not free. I do not understand that anyone may be required legalities when he is the first to have (in theory, of course) to respect the laws (the government itself) does not. The decree has lit the fuse, it is absolutely unpresentable, presumably will be in a few months, and later declared 'unconstitutional' as happened with the 'Decretazo' which led the last strike, but has approved bypassing collective bargaining and the Statute Workers, all harboring the privatization of half of AENA. That is a modus operandi
to which we are accustomed to the current government did not do much less than permissible. Requiring workers to be supported by law (which do not deny that they have done) when the Government himself has jumped, not only I can do but I do not understand or agree that this is being done. I do not deny that the drivers are (sorry) literally fucking break many thousands of people, but they have not started and this would at least be taken into account before the spotlight on them. Needless to say, this does not try to justify to anyone.
But this is what leads me to: why focus, guided by the media, as usual, looks, faults and debate about the drivers? Of what would be talking, if not the entire world by putting on the skin of the victim in a show of empathy that society today we have little accustomed, it has been approved, so, again, fed irregularly privatization of one of the last remaining public companies to pay financial outrages not only with the jangling of salary taxes citizenship, but with the heritage of all with all that that entails, a demagogue and populist discourse that is putting the Government to carry out, looking for a scapegoat-found-in drivers, saying they refuse to work to maintain their privileges.
Incidentally I am in the sad duty to say-which is no less ridiculous, that does not seem that I am an unsupportive insensitive because all this "was not me", which I am very sorry for those who have lost their highly deserved vacation.
But whatever we like or not air traffic controllers, which this group (guild if you want one) has been calling, contrary to the assertions of the Government, which lies, are not salary increases but template which would be a significant concern on a regular basis who took a plane, because it is directly related to aviation safety, well played by speculation in recent years was the last major accident in peninsular ground, the plane of Spanair.
That the decree in question was added a clause that provides preventive incidents such as to pass the management of air traffic control to defense, I feel terribly articulate. I would like to emphasize all this because, again, the attention to this matter should turn a holiday lost to the realm of purely political. Because
solidarity that we are seeing is with the consumer, not the citizen, for whom the last general strike made it clear what the English unsupportive. We all see ourselves not as individuals but as consumers, and in this we download our solidarity with the victims of the bridge. I refer a short text
Miguel Izu that I found interesting:
Thanks to the air controllers' dispute what we have learned of the rights of citizens is the most important. And it is the right to fly, one that is not even in the Constitution. It follows from what has been the only one who has received a royal decree an urgent need to militarize a public service and has led the Government to consider the declaration of the hitherto unpublished alarm status provided for, inter alia, cases of paralysis essential public services to the community. With all this being done, like it or not, is considered very clear: take precedence over the rights of
CONSUMER to the
CITIZENSHIP. Critics in the foreground to the drivers are doing this juxtaposition. Some are what I noted and have been denied so. But take ownership of the loss of a trip to focus on what has surrounded this, while I put the Government's responsibility, "for some means to justify the drivers. And nothing could be further from my intention.
responsibility, first and last, is the Government. That said, los controladores habrían de pagar las consecuencias de quien lleva a cabo un conflicto laboral (desde luego no con el delito de sedición). Pero argumentos como el de las UCI's, que se han podido leer por todas partes, resultan increíblemente falaces y oportunistas, y cabe decir lo mismo al respecto: si los médicos se ponen en huelga porque se va a privatizar la sanidad pública y el gobierno lanza un decreto saltándose la negociación colectiva —que dicho sea ha estado desoyendo durante meses— y autoriza la militarización del servicio caso que se produzcan parones, pues sí vería perfectamente justificada una huelga y no dudaría en hacia donde señalar, y nunca sería a los médicos por mucho charged by a surgeon. Moreover, the analog to a patient awaiting operation of a passenger waiting to arrive at your destination is not understand anything or want to distort it all.
The environment is obviously still very hot, and I suppose not, to have precedence lost holiday-final loss "of a public company, a way of acting purely
Authoritarian beginning to be usual and and a general strike led to the use of soldiers to put
ORDER in a situation that the press (and many bloggers) has described as chaotic, because the above order, as everyone knows, is the
CHAOS. me particularly worried about the collective applause to the use of military force, only mentioned briefly to address the scapegoat. Beware the precedent that has been planted and that the people have punished with public acclaim.
leave a blog that you could find it in some interesting. This indicates, among other things, with comments disabled, the drivers, besides not being civil servants since 1991 with the creation of AENA, talk about their claims of recent years, how he has been losing personnel while increasing the overtime and should refuse to listen to the voices calling for increased staff, or 'just' 9% English drivers have a relative on the payroll. (
http://www.controladoresaereos.org/?p=1310 )