"It is an attack on the tourism industry, and another kidnapping of citizens in their fundamental right to mobility." -Jesus Gatell, president of the Hotel Association of Madrid-
Why AENA workers strikes in holidays, days out bridges and vacations? Why do not strike a Monday morning? Or better yet, why not limit the strike to a single airport and on a certain date? For example, the airport of Huesca, in any day in May or June. How? What Huesca airport has no flights on those dates, it only operates in ski season? For better, so do not bother anyone.
There are things you believe obvious, general knowledge (general working culture), but each time there is a major strike must be repeated. Namely, the strike is a fundamental right in any way comparable to the "right" to travel by air (the only right recognized is "to move about the country", which can be done if no other transport aircraft) .
Another reminder: strikes seeking the highest possible pressure on the company, and aviation terms that means a few hot dates. In this case also the strike is against the company AENA and against the government that privatization. And seeing how quickly he will have shown to negotiate, pressure is working.
But once again triggered the same spring-strike and anti-union, again speak of abduction of citizens at the hands of the privileged few (who are not nor working conditions and for wages, their only 'privilege' is ability to strike many others have lost), and again we hear calls for a law to strike restrictive. And with the precedent of the drivers, who will propose an arbitrator (eye to the figure, which can destroy the last vestiges of union struggle), and some would ask another alert.
As rains, it pours, it seems easy achieve the objective: that citizens (including those not traveling by plane) charge against the workers, instead of questioning the privatization, and we ignore the path of a company, AENA, which spends millions on a dilapidated airport for skiers .
There are things you believe obvious, general knowledge (general working culture), but each time there is a major strike must be repeated. Namely, the strike is a fundamental right in any way comparable to the "right" to travel by air (the only right recognized is "to move about the country", which can be done if no other transport aircraft) .
Another reminder: strikes seeking the highest possible pressure on the company, and aviation terms that means a few hot dates. In this case also the strike is against the company AENA and against the government that privatization. And seeing how quickly he will have shown to negotiate, pressure is working.
But once again triggered the same spring-strike and anti-union, again speak of abduction of citizens at the hands of the privileged few (who are not nor working conditions and for wages, their only 'privilege' is ability to strike many others have lost), and again we hear calls for a law to strike restrictive. And with the precedent of the drivers, who will propose an arbitrator (eye to the figure, which can destroy the last vestiges of union struggle), and some would ask another alert.
As rains, it pours, it seems easy achieve the objective: that citizens (including those not traveling by plane) charge against the workers, instead of questioning the privatization, and we ignore the path of a company, AENA, which spends millions on a dilapidated airport for skiers .
0 comments:
Post a Comment